2005 Dodge Neon vs. 2008 Maybach 62
To start off, 2008 Maybach 62 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Neon would be higher. At 5,978 cc (12 cylinders), 2008 Maybach 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Maybach 62 (604 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 472 more horse power than 2005 Dodge Neon. (132 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Maybach 62 should accelerate faster than 2005 Dodge Neon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Maybach 62 weights approximately 1634 kg more than 2005 Dodge Neon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Maybach 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Maybach 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Maybach 62 (1,000 Nm) has 823 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Dodge Neon. (177 Nm). This means 2008 Maybach 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Neon | 2008 Maybach 62 | |
| Make | Dodge | Maybach |
| Model | Neon | 62 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 5978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 604 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 177 Nm | 1000 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 82.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 93 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1171 kg | 2805 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 6170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3830 mm |
| Fuel Consumption City | 8.1 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.4 L/100km | 16.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 110 L |
