2005 Dodge Neon vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Neon would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Neon (132 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt. (54 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 259 kg more than 2005 Dodge Neon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Neon (176 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt. (100 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Neon | 2010 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
Model | Neon | Colt |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1124 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 54 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 100 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87.1 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 84.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1191 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 6.5 L/100km | 4.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 8.1 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.4 L/100km | 5.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 47 L |