2005 Dodge Neon vs. 2012 Daewoo Rezzo
To start off, 2012 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Neon would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Neon (132 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2012 Daewoo Rezzo. (103 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 2012 Daewoo Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 176 kg more than 2005 Dodge Neon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Neon (177 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Daewoo Rezzo. (142 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Daewoo Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Neon | 2012 Daewoo Rezzo | |
| Make | Dodge | Daewoo |
| Model | Neon | Rezzo |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 103 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 177 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 81.5 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1171 kg | 1347 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.4 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 60 L |
