2005 Dodge Neon vs. 2012 Renault Symbol
To start off, 2012 Renault Symbol is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Neon would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Neon (132 HP) has 28 more horse power than 2012 Renault Symbol. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Symbol. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Neon weights approximately 171 kg more than 2012 Renault Symbol. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Neon (177 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Symbol. (148 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Symbol.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Neon | 2012 Renault Symbol | |
Make | Dodge | Renault |
Model | Neon | Symbol |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 177 Nm | 148 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1171 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4261 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1639 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1439 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2473 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.5 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |