2005 Dodge Neon vs. 2013 Ford F-150
To start off, 2013 Ford F-150 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Neon would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford F-150 (355 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 2005 Dodge Neon. (230 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2005 Dodge Neon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford F-150 weights approximately 1219 kg more than 2005 Dodge Neon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Ford F-150 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Dodge Neon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford F-150 (515 Nm) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Dodge Neon. (339 Nm). This means 2013 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Neon | 2013 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Neon | F-150 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2425 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 355 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 515 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 2534 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5888 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2464 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1928 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3683 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.8 L/100km | 10.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.7 L/100km | 15 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 136 L |