2005 Dodge Neon vs. 2013 Mazda 3
To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Neon would be higher. Both 2005 Dodge Neon and 2013 Mazda 3 are equipped with a 1,999 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 3 (146 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2005 Dodge Neon. (132 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Dodge Neon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda 3 weights approximately 129 kg more than 2005 Dodge Neon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda 3 (200 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Dodge Neon. (177 Nm). This means 2013 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Neon | 2013 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Neon | 3 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 146 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 177 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 83 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1171 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4595 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 6.5 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 8.1 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 55 L |
