2005 Dodge Ram vs. 1963 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (330 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1963 Ford Zodiac. (108 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Zodiac. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1481 kg more than 1963 Ford Zodiac. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 318 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Zodiac. (191 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Zodiac.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Ram | 1963 Ford Zodiac | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Ram | Zodiac |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5621 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 330 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Torque | 509 Nm | 191 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 82.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2751 kg | 1270 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5840 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2440 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2780 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 45 L |
