2005 Dodge Ram vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 281 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1624 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 346 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Ram | 1963 Holden EJ | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Ram | EJ |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5621 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 509 Nm | 163 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2758 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2050 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2680 mm |