2005 Dodge Ram vs. 1963 Seat 600
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 600 would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (330 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 306 more horse power than 1963 Seat 600. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 2176 kg more than 1963 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 462 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Seat 600. (47 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Ram | 1963 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Dodge | Seat |
| Model | Ram | 600 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 5621 cc | 767 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 330 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 509 Nm | 47 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 2751 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5840 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2440 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2010 mm |
