2005 Dodge Ram vs. 1966 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (346 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 276 more horse power than 1966 Ford 12 M. (70 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1684 kg more than 1966 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 374 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford 12 M. (135 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Ram | 1966 Ford 12 M | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Ram | 12 M |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5621 cc | 1699 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 346 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 509 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 82.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 82 mm |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2579 kg | 895 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 129 L | 68 L |
