2005 Dodge Ram vs. 1966 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 6,385 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (346 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1966 Ford Mustang. (320 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1400 kg more than 1966 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 424 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Mustang. (85 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Ram | 1966 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Ram | Mustang |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5621 cc | 6385 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 346 HP | 320 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 509 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 102.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 96 mm |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2579 kg | 1179 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 129 L | 45 L |
