2005 Dodge Ram vs. 1966 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (330 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 2266 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Ram | 1966 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Dodge | Lotus |
| Model | Ram | Elan |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5621 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 330 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2962 kg | 696 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5840 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2440 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2010 mm | 1180 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2240 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 45 L |
