2005 Dodge Ram vs. 1966 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercedes-Benz SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercedes-Benz SL would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (346 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 1966 Mercedes-Benz SL. (149 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1966 Mercedes-Benz SL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1279 kg more than 1966 Mercedes-Benz SL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 313 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Mercedes-Benz SL. (196 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Mercedes-Benz SL.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Ram | 1966 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Ram | SL |
Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5621 cc | 2306 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 509 Nm | 196 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 21.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2579 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 129 L | 52 L |