2005 Dodge Ram vs. 1966 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (330 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 295 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1991 kg more than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 428 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Ram | 1966 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
| Model | Ram | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 5621 cc | 785 cc |
| Horse Power | 330 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 509 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2751 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5840 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2440 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2250 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 66 L |
