2005 Dodge Ram vs. 1967 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (330 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1967 Mercury Cougar. (129 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1967 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1391 kg more than 1967 Mercury Cougar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Ram | 1967 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Dodge | Mercury |
| Model | Ram | Cougar |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5621 cc | 4727 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 330 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2751 kg | 1360 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5840 mm | 4990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2440 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2830 mm |
