2005 Dodge Ram vs. 1968 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (330 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 258 more horse power than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 2052 kg more than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 389 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Ram | 1968 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ram | Colt |
Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5621 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 330 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 509 Nm | 120 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2962 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5840 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2440 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2010 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2360 mm |