2005 Dodge Ram vs. 1976 Suzuki LJ 50
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (330 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 304 more horse power than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. (26 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 2011 kg more than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 457 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. (52 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Ram | 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 | |
| Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
| Model | Ram | LJ 50 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1976 |
| Engine Size | 5621 cc | 539 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 330 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 509 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2751 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5840 mm | 3280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2440 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 1940 mm |
