2005 Dodge Ram vs. 1979 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 8,277 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1503 kg more than 1979 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2005 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Ram | 1979 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ram | Colt |
Year Released | 2005 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8277 cc | 1244 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2313 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2310 mm |