2005 Dodge Ram vs. 1980 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (331 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 238 more horse power than 1980 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1774 kg more than 1980 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 358 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda Cosmo. (151 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Ram | 1980 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Ram | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1980 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5621 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 331 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 509 Nm | 151 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 88 mm |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2864 kg | 1090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6350 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2440 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 2520 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 65 L |
