2005 Dodge Ram vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1948 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2005 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Ram | 1980 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ram | Colt |
Year Released | 2005 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5621 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2758 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2050 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2310 mm |