2005 Dodge Ram vs. 1982 Mazda 626
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1917 kg more than 1982 Mazda 626.
Because 2005 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Ram | 1982 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Ram | 626 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5621 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 330 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2962 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5840 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2440 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2010 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2520 mm |