2005 Dodge Ram vs. 1982 Zastava 2101
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 8,277 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (500 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 438 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1353 kg more than 1982 Zastava 2101. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (713 Nm) has 626 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 2101.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Ram | 1982 Zastava 2101 | |
| Make | Dodge | Zastava |
| Model | Ram | 2101 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 8277 cc | 1198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 500 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 713 Nm | 87 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2313 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2430 mm |
