2005 Dodge Ram vs. 1983 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 294 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1560 kg more than 1983 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Ford Tempo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 397 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Tempo. (112 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Ram | 1983 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Ram | Tempo |
Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5621 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 509 Nm | 112 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2670 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6350 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2000 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 2540 mm |