2005 Dodge Ram vs. 1983 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 8,277 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (500 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 395 more horse power than 1983 Mazda RX-7. (105 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1983 Mazda RX-7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1253 kg more than 1983 Mazda RX-7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (713 Nm) has 568 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mazda RX-7. (145 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Ram | 1983 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Ram | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8277 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 713 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2313 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 65 L |