2005 Dodge Ram vs. 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,702 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1191 kg more than 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2005 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Ram | 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Dodge | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Ram | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4702 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 235 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2517 kg | 1326 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6350 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 2680 mm |
