2005 Dodge Ram vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (345 HP) has 150 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (195 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Because 2005 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Ram | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Ram | FTO |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5621 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 345 HP | 195 HP |
| Torque | 509 Nm | 202 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2050 mm | 1300 mm |
