2005 Dodge Ram vs. 2002 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 8,276 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (494 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 2002 GMC Sierra. (321 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2002 GMC Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 202 kg more than 2002 GMC Sierra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (691 Nm) has 320 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 GMC Sierra. (371 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 GMC Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Ram | 2002 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Dodge | GMC |
Model | Ram | Sierra |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8276 cc | 5967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 494 HP | 321 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 691 Nm | 371 Nm |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2472 kg | 2270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 5790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 3650 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 23.5 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 117 L |