2005 Dodge Ram vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (345 HP) has 275 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 2018 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 407 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Ram | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Dodge | MCC |
| Model | Ram | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 5621 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 345 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 509 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2758 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2000 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 1810 mm |
