2005 Dodge Ram vs. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (346 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2003 Land Rover Range Rover. (282 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2003 Land Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 64 kg more than 2003 Land Rover Range Rover. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Land Rover Range Rover. (440 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Ram | 2003 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Dodge | Land Rover |
| Model | Ram | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5621 cc | 4396 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 346 HP | 282 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 509 Nm | 440 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 82.7 mm |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2579 kg | 2515 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 2200 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 129 L | 100 L |
