2005 Dodge Ram vs. 2003 MG ZR
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MG ZR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MG ZR would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (331 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 2003 MG ZR. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2003 MG ZR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1844 kg more than 2003 MG ZR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 386 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG ZR. (123 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG ZR.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Ram | 2003 MG ZR | |
| Make | Dodge | MG |
| Model | Ram | ZR |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5621 cc | 1396 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 331 HP | 102 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 509 Nm | 123 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 75.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2864 kg | 1020 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6350 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2440 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 50 L |
