2005 Dodge Ram vs. 2003 Toyota Echo
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Toyota Echo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Toyota Echo would be higher. At 8,276 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (494 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 380 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Echo. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Echo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1462 kg more than 2003 Toyota Echo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (691 Nm) has 534 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Toyota Echo. (157 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Toyota Echo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Ram | 2003 Toyota Echo | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Ram | Echo |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8276 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 494 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 691 Nm | 157 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 84.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2472 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 23.5 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 45 L |