2005 Dodge Ram vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 8,276 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (494 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 355 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 6. (139 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1097 kg more than 2004 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (691 Nm) has 510 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 6. (181 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Ram | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Ram | 6 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8276 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 494 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 691 Nm | 181 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 87.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 11.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2472 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 23.5 L/100km | 8.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 64 L |