2005 Dodge Ram vs. 2005 Suzuki Reno
To start off, both 2005 Dodge Ram and 2005 Suzuki Reno were released in the same year (2005). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 8,276 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (494 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 368 more horse power than 2005 Suzuki Reno. (126 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2005 Suzuki Reno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1210 kg more than 2005 Suzuki Reno. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (691 Nm) has 513 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Suzuki Reno. (178 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Suzuki Reno.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Ram | 2005 Suzuki Reno | |
Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
Model | Ram | Reno |
Year Released | 2005 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8276 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 494 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 691 Nm | 178 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2472 kg | 1262 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 19.6 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 26.1 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 23.5 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 55 L |