2005 Dodge Ram vs. 2006 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2006 Jeep Commander is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (346 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 2006 Jeep Commander. (210 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2006 Jeep Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 902 kg more than 2006 Jeep Commander. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Jeep Commander. (319 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Jeep Commander.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Ram | 2006 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Dodge | Jeep |
Model | Ram | Commander |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5621 cc | 3704 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 509 Nm | 319 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 17.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2579 kg | 1677 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 2270 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 129 L | 78 L |