2005 Dodge Ram vs. 2010 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2010 GMC Yukon is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 GMC Yukon (352 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2005 Dodge Ram. (330 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2005 Dodge Ram. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 143 kg more than 2010 GMC Yukon.
Because 2005 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 GMC Yukon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 GMC Yukon (517 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Dodge Ram. (509 Nm). This means 2010 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Ram | 2010 GMC Yukon | |
Make | Dodge | GMC |
Model | Ram | Yukon |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5621 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 330 HP | 352 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 509 Nm | 517 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2962 kg | 2819 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5840 mm | 5649 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2440 mm | 2009 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2010 mm | 1951 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 3302 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 148 L |