2005 Dodge Ram vs. 2010 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2010 Nissan Titan is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 8,276 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (494 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Titan. (317 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Titan.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (691 Nm) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Nissan Titan. (522 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Nissan Titan.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Ram | 2010 Nissan Titan | |
| Make | Dodge | Nissan |
| Model | Ram | Titan |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 8276 cc | 5551 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 494 HP | 317 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 691 Nm | 522 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 5710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 4060 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 19.6 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 26.1 L/100km | 19.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 23.5 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 140 L |
