2005 Dodge Ram vs. 2012 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2012 Chrysler 300 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 8,276 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (494 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 2012 Chrysler 300. (363 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2012 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 510 kg more than 2012 Chrysler 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (691 Nm) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chrysler 300. (534 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Ram | 2012 Chrysler 300 | |
Make | Dodge | Chrysler |
Model | Ram | 300 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8276 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 494 HP | 363 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 691 Nm | 534 Nm |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2472 kg | 1962 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 5044 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1486 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 3053 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 19.6 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 26.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 72 L |