2005 Dodge Ram vs. 2013 Ford E-Series
To start off, 2013 Ford E-Series is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (331 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2013 Ford E-Series. (252 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2013 Ford E-Series. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 34 kg more than 2013 Ford E-Series. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ford E-Series. (474 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ford E-Series.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Ram | 2013 Ford E-Series | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Ram | E-Series |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5621 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 331 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 509 Nm | 474 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 106 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.06:1 |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 12 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2864 kg | 2830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6350 mm | 5504 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2440 mm | 2017 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 2111 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 3505 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 181 L |
