2005 Dodge Ram vs. 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE
To start off, 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE (488 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 2005 Dodge Ram. (330 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE should accelerate faster than 2005 Dodge Ram. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 871 kg more than 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE. (450 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Ram | 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE | |
Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
Model | Ram | F-TYPE |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5621 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 330 HP | 488 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 509 Nm | 450 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.5:1 |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2751 kg | 1880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5840 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2440 mm | 2053 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2909 mm |