2005 Dodge Ram vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Ram would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 112 kg more than 2005 Dodge Ram.
Because 2005 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm) has 313 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Dodge Ram. (407 Nm). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Ram | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Dodge | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Ram | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 235 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5350 RPM |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 720 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 84 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2517 kg | 2629 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6350 mm | 5612 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1987 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1598 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 3320 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 10.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 100 L |
