2005 Dodge Ram vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Ram would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 336 kg more than 2005 Dodge Ram.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Dodge Ram. (713 Nm). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Ram | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Dodge | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Ram | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 500 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5350 RPM |
| Torque | 713 Nm | 720 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 84 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2313 kg | 2649 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 5842 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1638 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 3570 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 15.7 L/100km | 10.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 26.1 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 100 L |
