2005 Dodge Ram vs. 2013 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2013 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (331 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2013 Toyota 4Runner. (266 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2013 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 680 kg more than 2013 Toyota 4Runner. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Toyota 4Runner. (377 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Ram | 2013 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Ram | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5621 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 331 HP | 266 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 509 Nm | 377 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 95 mm |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2864 kg | 2184 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6350 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2440 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 87 L |