2005 Dodge Ram vs. 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser
To start off, 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 8,276 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (494 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 238 more horse power than 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser. (256 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 509 kg more than 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (691 Nm) has 324 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser. (367 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Ram | 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Ram | FJ Cruiser |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8276 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 494 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 691 Nm | 367 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 95 mm |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2472 kg | 1963 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 19.6 L/100km | 10.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 26.1 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 72 L |