2005 Dodge Viper vs. 2004 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2005 Dodge Viper is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Volvo XC90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Volvo XC90 would be higher. At 8,277 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Viper (493 HP) has 225 more horse power than 2004 Volvo XC90. (268 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Viper should accelerate faster than 2004 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 570 kg more than 2005 Dodge Viper.
Because 2004 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Dodge Viper. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Viper (712 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 332 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Volvo XC90. (380 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2005 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Volvo XC90.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Viper | 2004 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Dodge | Volvo |
Model | Viper | XC90 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8277 cc | 2901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 493 HP | 268 HP |
Torque | 712 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1536 kg | 2106 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.8 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 19.6 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 72 L |