2005 Eagle Talon vs. 1954 Riley RM A
To start off, 2005 Eagle Talon is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Eagle Talon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Eagle Talon weights approximately 185 kg more than 1954 Riley RM A.
Because 1954 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Eagle Talon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Eagle Talon | 1954 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Eagle | Riley |
| Model | Talon | RM A |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1954 |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2870 mm |
