2005 Eagle Vision vs. 1963 Holden FB Special
To start off, 2005 Eagle Vision is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden FB Special. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden FB Special would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Eagle Vision (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1963 Holden FB Special. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden FB Special. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Eagle Vision weights approximately 470 kg more than 1963 Holden FB Special. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Holden FB Special is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden FB Special. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Eagle Vision | 1963 Holden FB Special | |
Make | Eagle | Holden |
Model | Vision | FB Special |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2700 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1710 mm |