2005 Eagle Vision vs. 1968 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2005 Eagle Vision is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Eagle Vision (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Eagle Vision weights approximately 660 kg more than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Eagle Vision | 1968 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Eagle | Mitsubishi |
Model | Vision | Colt |
Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2700 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1410 mm |