2005 Eagle Vision vs. 2003 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2005 Eagle Vision is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 197 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econoline weights approximately 755 kg more than 2005 Eagle Vision.
Because 2003 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Eagle Vision | 2003 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Eagle | Ford |
Model | Vision | Econoline |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2700 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 2060 mm |