2005 Eagle Vision vs. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Eagle Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Eagle Vision would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Eagle Vision (197 HP) has 43 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C-Crosser. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C-Crosser.
Because 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Eagle Vision. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Eagle Vision has automatic transmission and 2009 Citroen C-Crosser has manual transmission. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Eagle Vision will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Eagle Vision | 2009 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Eagle | Citroen |
Model | Vision | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2700 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 154 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |