2005 Eagle Vision vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Eagle Vision. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Eagle Vision would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Eagle Vision (197 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2010 Nissan X-Trail. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan X-Trail.
Because 2010 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Eagle Vision. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Eagle Vision has automatic transmission and 2010 Nissan X-Trail has manual transmission. 2010 Nissan X-Trail will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Eagle Vision will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Eagle Vision | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Eagle | Nissan |
Model | Vision | X-Trail |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2700 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1690 mm |